http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30139606
This article is pretty slick. It details a lot of the issues now about immigration reform. It starts out with very similar quotes about immigration from both political parties and raises the question of why no one wants to get along.
It goes on about how Obama is just tired of the back and forth and getting nothing done, so now he's going to do something, the article even likens him to Teddy Roosevelt using his 'big stick'.
Obama insists the system is broken and the article explains how it would take thirty years to deport everyone who's here illegally.
A lot of people who are against immigrations are those with low immigrant populations. They also believe that most of the immigrants are Mexicans and there are more just waiting for the other shoe to drop to run over the border. But statistics tells us that isn't true. There are a lot more going back to Mexico because their economy is getting off and running.
Monday, November 24, 2014
Monday, November 17, 2014
Reactionary Republicans
http://www.voanews.com/content/obama-planning-to-shield-millions-from-deportation/2520454.html
So, here's my thing. I've read four or five of articles along the same line as this one. Basically, the president is going to hold off deportations for children fleeing violence from Central America and their parents. And the Republicans are calling foul. The argument runs that he's abusing his executive power, yadda yadda yadda.
I have yet to hear any plan for immigration reform by Republicans beyond 'whatever Obama does, we will block it'. I don't think the reactive game plan is ever a good idea, but this just hits me as childish. I can't find anything in my casual searching on what Republicans plan on doing, I just keep hearing about what Obama is going to do, which tends to be stable. He's going to protect children and their families fleeing violence from drugs and war in Central America. Yes there's five million of them but how is that not the right thing to do?
So, here's my thing. I've read four or five of articles along the same line as this one. Basically, the president is going to hold off deportations for children fleeing violence from Central America and their parents. And the Republicans are calling foul. The argument runs that he's abusing his executive power, yadda yadda yadda.
I have yet to hear any plan for immigration reform by Republicans beyond 'whatever Obama does, we will block it'. I don't think the reactive game plan is ever a good idea, but this just hits me as childish. I can't find anything in my casual searching on what Republicans plan on doing, I just keep hearing about what Obama is going to do, which tends to be stable. He's going to protect children and their families fleeing violence from drugs and war in Central America. Yes there's five million of them but how is that not the right thing to do?
Monday, November 10, 2014
Canada's Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act
http://www.voanews.com/content/canada-considers-immigration-ban-on-polygamists/2510250.html
Canada is considering limiting the rights of immigrant polygamists in the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act which has got to be the best name for a law I have ever heard.
Canada already bans polygamy and this law would close the loophole that would let polygamists get immigration benefits. They can also deport polygamists without needing to convict them of any criminal activity.
This law would also criminalize forced marriages and limits the defense of honor killings in legal cases. It puts the minimum age for marriage at sixteen. Those under the age of 18 would need parental consent.
Canada is considering limiting the rights of immigrant polygamists in the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act which has got to be the best name for a law I have ever heard.
Canada already bans polygamy and this law would close the loophole that would let polygamists get immigration benefits. They can also deport polygamists without needing to convict them of any criminal activity.
This law would also criminalize forced marriages and limits the defense of honor killings in legal cases. It puts the minimum age for marriage at sixteen. Those under the age of 18 would need parental consent.
Monday, November 3, 2014
The sanctuary movement
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/24/us/us-religious-leaders-embrace-cause-of-immigrant-children.html?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Ar%2C%7B%222%22%3A%22RI%3A13%22%7D
Like we talked about in class today, the new surge of immigrant children fleeing Central America are getting the attention of religious groups, hoping to take them in and protect them amidst arguments of sending them back, claiming America cannot take in every child with a problem.
Religious groups argue that this isn't just a political issue but a moral one. They are trying to make it clear that these kids are people not problems. They are trying to get them out of detention centers and keep them from being deported.
So while Congress is deadlocked over the issue, churches are going out of their way to offer food and shelter and just basic necessities. Many have moved to the direction of immigration reform which is unusual for traditionally conservative groups.
Like we talked about in class today, the new surge of immigrant children fleeing Central America are getting the attention of religious groups, hoping to take them in and protect them amidst arguments of sending them back, claiming America cannot take in every child with a problem.
Religious groups argue that this isn't just a political issue but a moral one. They are trying to make it clear that these kids are people not problems. They are trying to get them out of detention centers and keep them from being deported.
So while Congress is deadlocked over the issue, churches are going out of their way to offer food and shelter and just basic necessities. Many have moved to the direction of immigration reform which is unusual for traditionally conservative groups.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)